Tuesday, March 16, 2010

LEAF Motor: Spin-Up

The Less Epic Axial Flux motor, a thought exercise a bit over five weeks ago, is now a spinning physical prototype. (Okay, I cheated a little since the rotor disks were already made for the original Epic Axial Flux motor.) Most of what remained to be fabricated was the new coreless stator. Although the entire motor did get a bit of a redesign. Here is the exploded view of the latest design:

Click for full-res.

And, the collapsed version:

  Click for full-res.

The only new thing since last post is the "outrunner outrigger." It connects the mounting structure to one side of the motor shaft, which is not rotating. This completes a structural loop, giving the shaft more stiffness than if it were just connected to the central stator structure. The extra weight it adds is offset by the ability to take significantly more abuse from the chain load on that side of the rotor. This is a minor design change, though. What about the windings?

There's the first six, done in about three hours.

Compared to the ones in the scooter motors, these windings are a breeze to make, for a number of reasons. First, the flat magnet wire is absolutely wonderful. It packs nicely and stays where you put it. But, it only really works because I can remove individual winding inserts and wind in free space. This means instead of looping wire through slots, I simply spin the entire insert, spooling wire onto it under tension. It's not trivial, but it's not very hard either. I would place that in the "win" category for this motor.

All the windings, a two-day job.

With all 12 windings in place, and plenty of room in the center of the stator for interconnections, the job is easily finished. I decided to connect all four winding sets (12 divided by 3-phase) in parallel, and to wire the parallel sets in delta. This will give the lowest-voltage, highest-current motor possible with these windings. Before you yell at me for that being the most inefficient configuration: To first order, it can produce the same power per unit dissipation in the copper. And even in this lowest-voltage configuration, the motor still takes about 50V to get to 3,000RPM. When I get a controller that can handle more than 48V, I'll re-wire it. For now, I'm eager to get on with testing, so I put it together:

Kit Bot FTW. I'll replace the outrigger later.

It's not set up for sensored control yet, so I needed to borrow a high-current sensorless controller. Luckily, I know exactly where to find one. Cold Arbor, a combat robot with a brushless cold saw, happens to live nearby and also happened to have pre-cut and stripped wires courtesy of a particularly violent match. So, with a kick-start to get the sensorless controller going, it spins up:


This test went to 1,500rpm. (Not 3,000 as the tachometer seems to say.) That's at 22V using BLDC (square wave) control. This falls right into the expected range for the delta-wound, 40-turn, 4-in-parallel winding set. It seems to draw a good deal of no-load current at this speed (15A). I think it's too early to say whether this is a function of circulating current in the delta winding, eddy currents, bearing losses (and in what proportions). The next step will be to set it up on my sinusoidal controller with rotor position sensors and see how it fares then. Since this is the target control scheme anyway, I will defer judgment for now and move on to smaller and better things...

11 comments:

  1. SWEET!!! Can't wait to see it on your controller.

    Speaking of controllers, I have need of a BLDC controller to control a sensorless motor that is going to spin the input to my speedometer (since I no longer have the transmission, the speedo cable has nothing to connect to). I was thinking of using an RC BLDC motor to turn the input to the speedo but I need very good control of motor RPM over a range of 0-2000 RPM.

    Did you make any progress on the RC car motor? Would your 3ph DUO be a good candidate for this application?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Second question: Is there any reason you couldn't make the winding cores out of a standard magnetic laminate? I know this design is coreless, but those black triangles seem so much easier to manufacture instead of the "H" core in the Epic.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Cooling solution, maybe? Make the winding cores out of some sort of liquid carrier?

    ReplyDelete
  4. SHANE!!

    just curious what power range you were aiming for (xx kw?). Progress looks frigging astounding. Great work

    -Dane

    ReplyDelete
  5. Thanks! Aiming for 10kW at 3,000RPM, but not there yet I don't think. I would also like to make a lighter version. I think I can get it down to 18lbs (currently 24lbs).

    @Electric_02: I am thinking about liquid cooling solutions running lines in the gaps between windings. Another interesting suggestion somebody had was to just run deionized water or even oil straight through the stator. Sounds messy to me.

    The problem with making these cores laminated is that the "easy" direction to slice it (axial) doesn't help. It would need to be stacked either radially or tangentially, both ways have varying cross sections. Sintered iron cores could work, though.

    The speedo sound like a job for a servomotor controller. (Go this speed no matter what.) My RC system is torque-controlled, not speed controlled, although it could probably be reprogrammed to do speed control. With a typical RC controller, you get voltage control. It's roughly proportional to speed, but not exact.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think I remember you saying that the sintered metal was brittle and therefore subject to shattering (not good for the my motor application). What about this: Make small diamter ( < 1/4in) sintered metal cylinders, place them in a grid lengthwise then pour some sort of epoxy or plastic to hold them in alignment. That way you could make any shape core you wanted (approximately) without having to have one large fragile block of sintered metal. (Nevermind, I know, coreless....)

    I get what you are saying about the voltage controlled, not speed controlled controllers. I guess without some sort of speed feedback, the controller doesn't really have any idea of the speed of the motor because it doesn't know what the load is. I was hoping that by controlling the waveform generated to drive the motor, you would know what the speed of the motor was and then a feedback loop could be programmed to maintain a desired speed.

    As far as the direct oil cooling... I've heard of such things before. You're right, sounds MESSY, especially if you ever had to take one apart.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Friggin awesome so far... I can't wait to see it finished!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Have you thought about the new Insulated Iron Powder for a core. Better than sintered iron since it is pressed tight with epoxy and each iron particle is insulated from the next.

    You could wrap it axially with a thin piece of kevlar or fiberglass to ensure it keeps its shape even if it was to get damaged..... just a thought.. That is what I am trying to get a hold of. I tried using laminations like from Protolam but they wanted like $5K for just one simple motors worth... Way to fracken expensive.

    Good luck and Great progress.. JC

    ReplyDelete
  9. Good FKN mechanical Design but you are far away from good BLDC motor you FKN idiot, you must have some E. engineer helping you idiot!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Could it be a problem using Carbon fiber because it is conductive and may cause Eddie current? Thinking of your 15 amp no load.
    -verk nice projekt -AK

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I did the math on that (using measured CF conductivity) and don't think it would account for that much load. I still think it is due to tangential field cutting through the wide dimension of the flat wire. Iron core motors wouldn't have this issue since the field is contained in the stator steel. I didn't think about the consequences of flat wire in a coreless motor, though.

      Delete